Titleist 695.MB vs Titleist ZM
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Titleist 695.MBforged muscleback · forged carbon steelTitleist ZMforged muscleback · forged 1020 mild carbon steel with bright chrome plating
Specification comparison
| Club | 695.MB loft | ZM loft | 695.MB lie | ZM lie | 695.MB length | ZM length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 19 | — | 59 | — | 39.5 | — |
| 3 | 22 | 21 | 60 | 60 | 39 | 39 |
| 4 | 25 | 24 | 61 | 61 | 38.5 | 38.5 |
| 5 | 28 | 27 | 62 | 62 | 38 | 38 |
| 6 | 32 | 31 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| 7 | 36 | 35 | 63 | 63 | 37 | 37 |
| 8 | 40 | 39 | 63.5 | 63.5 | 36.5 | 36.5 |
| 9 | 44 | 43 | 64 | 64 | 36 | 36 |
| PW | 48 | 47 | 64 | 64 | 35.75 | 35.75 |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Which should you choose?
The ZM is the stronger-lofted set — up to 1° stronger than the 695.MB on matching clubs. Expect longer carry per numbered iron but a flatter descent angle; gapping at the wedge end is where that shows up.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Titleist 695.MB specs and Titleist ZM specs.