Callaway Big Bertha (2008) vs Callaway FT i-brid
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Specification comparison
| Club | Big Bertha (2008) loft | FT i-brid loft | Big Bertha (2008) lie | FT i-brid lie | Big Bertha (2008) length | FT i-brid length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 20 | 19 | 60.5 | 60.5 | 39 | 39.75 |
| 4 | 23 | 22 | 61 | 61 | 38.5 | 39 |
| 5 | 26 | 25 | 61.5 | 61.5 | 38 | 38.25 |
| 6 | 29 | 28 | 62 | 62 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| 7 | 33 | 32 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 37 | 37 |
| 8 | 37 | 36 | 63 | 63 | 36.5 | 36.5 |
| 9 | 41 | 40 | 64 | 64 | 36 | 36 |
| PW | 45 | 44 | 65 | 65 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
| AW | 50 | 49 | 65 | 65 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
| SW | 55 | 54 | 65 | 65 | 35.25 | 35.25 |
| LW | — | 59 | — | 65 | — | 35 |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Lofts compared
- Big Bertha (2008)
- FT i-brid
What the differences mean
At the 7-iron, the Big Bertha (2008) is 33° and the FT i-brid is 32°, a 1° gap. Each degree of loft is worth roughly 3 to 4 yards of carry at the same swing speed, so the FT i-brid should carry roughly 3 to 4 yards further with that club, on a slightly lower, shallower flight than the Big Bertha (2008). Across the 10 clubs both sets share, the FT i-brid averages 1° stronger, with the largest gap at the 3-iron (20° vs 19°). The pitching wedges are 45° and 44°; the stronger one leaves a 6° jump to a 50° gap wedge, which matters when planning wedge gapping.
The sets are built differently: the Big Bertha (2008) runs 3-iron to SW (10 clubs), the FT i-brid 3-iron to LW (11 clubs).
The Big Bertha (2008) is a game improvement iron and the FT i-brid a super game improvement iron, so they sit one step apart on the forgiveness scale. The FT i-brid is the more forgiving design, with a wider sole, more offset and more perimeter weighting for high handicaps, beginners and slower swing speeds. The Big Bertha (2008) trades some of that for a more compact head, thinner topline and more control over flight and shape, which suits roughly 10 to 25 handicaps.
The Big Bertha (2008) is listed as investment cast wide-sole cavity back and the FT i-brid as multi-material hybrid-iron (Fusion body, modified Tru-Bore). With the build method this similar, differences in feel come down to head size, sole width, topline and offset rather than how the heads are made.
Both sets were introduced in 2008, so this is a choice between two models from the same lineup rather than an upgrade: Callaway designed them to sit side by side for different players.
Which should you choose?
The FT i-brid is the stronger-lofted set — up to 1° stronger than the Big Bertha (2008) on matching clubs. Expect longer carry per numbered iron but a flatter descent angle; gapping at the wedge end is where that shows up.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Callaway Big Bertha (2008) specs and Callaway FT i-brid specs.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Callaway Big Bertha (2008) stronger lofted than the FT i-brid?
No. The FT i-brid is the stronger-lofted set: its 7-iron is 32° against 33° for the Callaway Big Bertha (2008), 1° stronger and worth roughly 3 to 4 yards of extra carry.
What is the loft difference between the Callaway Big Bertha (2008) and FT i-brid?
At the 7-iron the difference is 1° (33° vs 32°). The largest gap on a shared club is 1° at the 3-iron, and all 10 shared clubs differ.
Which is better for higher handicap golfers, the Callaway Big Bertha (2008) or the FT i-brid?
The FT i-brid. As a super game improvement iron it is the more forgiving design, suited to high handicaps, beginners and slower swing speeds. The Callaway Big Bertha (2008) is a game improvement iron, better suited to roughly 10 to 25 handicaps.
Do the Callaway Big Bertha (2008) and FT i-brid have the same lie and length?
At the 7-iron, yes: both are 62.5° lie and 37 inches long.
Shop both models
Compare prices for new and used sets on eBay:
We may earn a commission from purchases made through links on this page at no extra cost to you.