Maltby TS-1 IM vs Maltby TS-4
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Maltby TS-1 IMthree-piece billet forged hollow body with injected polymer face backing ("Injected Muscle") · forged 1025C carbon steel body, 2.1 mm MS300 super maraging steel face, internal tungsten toe weightMaltby TS-4billet forged muscle back, co-forged tungsten toe weight, CMC inserts · forged 1025C carbon steel with tungsten and Ceramic Matrix Composite
Specification comparison
| Club | TS-1 IM loft | TS-4 loft | TS-1 IM lie | TS-4 lie | TS-1 IM length | TS-4 length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 20 | 20 | 60 | 60.5 | 39 | 39 |
| 4 | 22 | 23 | 60.5 | 61 | 38.5 | 38.5 |
| 5 | 25.5 | 26 | 61 | 61.5 | 38 | 38 |
| 6 | 29 | 29.5 | 61.5 | 62 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| 7 | 32.5 | 33 | 62 | 62.5 | 37 | 37 |
| 8 | 36 | 37 | 62.5 | 63 | 36.5 | 36.5 |
| 9 | 40 | 41 | 63 | 63.5 | 36 | 36 |
| PW | 44 | 45.5 | 63.5 | 64 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
| GW | 48 | 50 | 64 | 64 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Which should you choose?
The TS-4 is the weaker-lofted set — up to 2° weaker than the TS-1 IM. That trades raw distance for a steeper landing angle and more predictable stopping power into greens.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Maltby TS-1 IM specs and Maltby TS-4 specs.