Mizuno MP-53 vs Mizuno JPX-800
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Mizuno MP-53forged · 1025E Pure Select mild carbon steelMizuno JPX-800investment cast, split construction across the set · stainless steel with a Hot Metal face
Specification comparison
| Club | MP-53 loft | JPX-800 loft | MP-53 lie | JPX-800 lie | MP-53 length | JPX-800 length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 21 | — | 59.5 | — | 38.75 | — |
| 4 | 24 | 22 | 60 | 60 | 38.25 | 38.25 |
| 5 | 27 | 25 | 60.5 | 60.5 | 37.75 | 37.75 |
| 6 | 30 | 28 | 61 | 61 | 37.25 | 37.25 |
| 7 | 34 | 32 | 61.5 | 61.5 | 36.75 | 36.75 |
| 8 | 38 | 36 | 62 | 62 | 36.25 | 36.25 |
| 9 | 42 | 40 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 35.75 | 35.75 |
| PW | 46 | 44 | 63 | 63 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
| GW | — | 49 | — | 63 | — | 35.25 |
| SW | — | 55 | — | 63 | — | 35.25 |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Which should you choose?
The JPX-800 is the stronger-lofted set — up to 2° stronger than the MP-53 on matching clubs. Expect longer carry per numbered iron but a flatter descent angle; gapping at the wedge end is where that shows up.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Mizuno MP-53 specs and Mizuno JPX-800 specs.