Ping Blueprint vs Ping Blueprint T
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Specification comparison
| Club | Blueprint loft | Blueprint T loft | Blueprint lie | Blueprint T lie | Blueprint length | Blueprint T length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 17.5 | — | 58.3 | — | 39.25 | — |
| 3 | 20 | 19 | 59 | 59 | 38.75 | 38.75 |
| 4 | 23.5 | 22.5 | 59.8 | 59.8 | 38.25 | 38.25 |
| 5 | 27 | 26 | 60.5 | 60.5 | 37.75 | 37.75 |
| 6 | 30.5 | 29.5 | 61.3 | 61.3 | 37.25 | 37.25 |
| 7 | 34 | 33 | 62 | 62 | 36.75 | 36.75 |
| 8 | 38 | 37 | 62.8 | 62.8 | 36.25 | 36.25 |
| 9 | 42 | 41 | 63.5 | 63.5 | 35.75 | 35.75 |
| PW | 46 | 45 | 64.1 | 64.1 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Lofts compared
- Blueprint
- Blueprint T
What the differences mean
At the 7-iron, the Blueprint is 34° and the Blueprint T is 33°, a 1° gap. Each degree of loft is worth roughly 3 to 4 yards of carry at the same swing speed, so the Blueprint T should carry roughly 3 to 4 yards further with that club, on a slightly lower, shallower flight than the Blueprint. Across the 8 clubs both sets share, the Blueprint T averages 1° stronger, with the largest gap at the 3-iron (20° vs 19°). The pitching wedges are 46° and 45°; the stronger one leaves a 5° jump to a 50° gap wedge, which matters when planning wedge gapping.
The sets are built differently: the Blueprint runs 2-iron to PW (9 clubs), the Blueprint T 3-iron to PW (8 clubs).
Both are blade irons, built for low single-digit handicaps who strike the ball consistently. Compact muscleback irons with minimal offset, thin toplines and the smallest sweet spot — built for shot-shaping over forgiveness. Because they target the same golfer, the decision comes down to the specific loft, feel and shaping differences rather than who the sets are made for.
Both heads are listed as forged. The Blueprint adds tungsten weighting, which lowers the centre of gravity and raises stability on mis-hits, helping the long irons launch.
There are 5 years between these sets (2019 and 2024), more than one design generation. Over that time irons moved toward stronger lofts, thinner and faster faces, hollow and multi-material heads and wider use of tungsten, so the newer set is not simply a better version of the older one: it may launch and spin quite differently. Here the 7-iron loft moved from 34° to 33°.
Which should you choose?
The Blueprint T is the stronger-lofted set — up to 1° stronger than the Blueprint on matching clubs. Expect longer carry per numbered iron but a flatter descent angle; gapping at the wedge end is where that shows up.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Ping Blueprint specs and Ping Blueprint T specs.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ping Blueprint stronger lofted than the Blueprint T?
No. The Blueprint T is the stronger-lofted set: its 7-iron is 33° against 34° for the Ping Blueprint, 1° stronger and worth roughly 3 to 4 yards of extra carry.
What is the loft difference between the Ping Blueprint and Blueprint T?
At the 7-iron the difference is 1° (34° vs 33°). The largest gap on a shared club is 1° at the 3-iron, and all 8 shared clubs differ.
Are the Ping Blueprint and Blueprint T aimed at the same golfer?
Yes. Both are blade irons, built for low single-digit handicaps who strike the ball consistently. Choose on feel, looks and gapping, ideally after hitting both.
Do the Ping Blueprint and Blueprint T have the same lie and length?
At the 7-iron, yes: both are 62° lie and 36.75 inches long.
Shop Ping Blueprint
Compare prices for new and used sets on eBay:
We may earn a commission from purchases made through links on this page at no extra cost to you.