Ping i vs Ping iBlade
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Ping iinvestment cast · 431 stainless steel with tungsten toe weightsPing iBladeinvestment cast · 431 stainless steel with pressed tungsten toe weights
Specification comparison
| Club | i loft | iBlade loft | i lie | iBlade lie | i length | iBlade length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 20 | 20 | 59.63 | 59 | 39 | 39 |
| 4 | 23 | 23.5 | 60.38 | 59.8 | 38.5 | 38.5 |
| 5 | 26 | 27 | 61.13 | 60.5 | 38 | 38 |
| 6 | 29 | 30.5 | 61.88 | 61.3 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| 7 | 32 | 34 | 62.63 | 62 | 37 | 37 |
| 8 | 36 | 38 | 63.38 | 62.8 | 36.5 | 36.5 |
| 9 | 41 | 42 | 64.13 | 63.5 | 36 | 36 |
| PW | 45 | 46 | 64.75 | 64.1 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
| UW | 50 | — | 64.75 | — | 35.5 | — |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Which should you choose?
The iBlade is the weaker-lofted set — up to 2° weaker than the i. That trades raw distance for a steeper landing angle and more predictable stopping power into greens.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Ping i specs and Ping iBlade specs.