Ping iBlade vs Ping Blueprint
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Ping iBladeinvestment cast · 431 stainless steel with pressed tungsten toe weightsPing Blueprintforged · 8620 carbon steel with a tungsten toe screw
Specification comparison
| Club | iBlade loft | Blueprint loft | iBlade lie | Blueprint lie | iBlade length | Blueprint length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | — | 17.5 | — | 58.3 | — | 39.25 |
| 3 | 20 | 20 | 59 | 59 | 39 | 38.75 |
| 4 | 23.5 | 23.5 | 59.8 | 59.8 | 38.5 | 38.25 |
| 5 | 27 | 27 | 60.5 | 60.5 | 38 | 37.75 |
| 6 | 30.5 | 30.5 | 61.3 | 61.3 | 37.5 | 37.25 |
| 7 | 34 | 34 | 62 | 62 | 37 | 36.75 |
| 8 | 38 | 38 | 62.8 | 62.8 | 36.5 | 36.25 |
| 9 | 42 | 42 | 63.5 | 63.5 | 36 | 35.75 |
| PW | 46 | 46 | 64.1 | 64.1 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Which should you choose?
The iBlade and Blueprint share the same lofts on every club on file, so the difference is in head construction, feel and forgiveness rather than trajectory.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Ping iBlade specs and Ping Blueprint specs.