Ping iBlade vs Ping i59
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Ping iBladeinvestment cast · 431 stainless steel with pressed tungsten toe weightsPing i59forged body with a bonded face and an internal aluminium insert · forged 1025 carbon steel body, forged 17-4 stainless face and an aerospace-grade aluminium insert
Specification comparison
| Club | iBlade loft | i59 loft | iBlade lie | i59 lie | iBlade length | i59 length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 20 | 20 | 59 | 59 | 39 | 39 |
| 4 | 23.5 | 23.5 | 59.8 | 59.8 | 38.5 | 38.5 |
| 5 | 27 | 27 | 60.5 | 60.5 | 38 | 38 |
| 6 | 30.5 | 30.5 | 61.3 | 61.3 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| 7 | 34 | 34 | 62 | 62 | 37 | 37 |
| 8 | 38 | 38 | 62.8 | 62.8 | 36.5 | 36.5 |
| 9 | 42 | 42 | 63.5 | 63.5 | 36 | 36 |
| PW | 46 | 46 | 64.1 | 64.1 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Which should you choose?
The iBlade and i59 share the same lofts on every club on file, so the difference is in head construction, feel and forgiveness rather than trajectory.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Ping iBlade specs and Ping i59 specs.