Titleist AP2 (2008) vs Titleist ZM
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Specification comparison
| Club | AP2 (2008) loft | ZM loft | AP2 (2008) lie | ZM lie | AP2 (2008) length | ZM length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 21 | 21 | 60 | 60 | 39 | 39 |
| 4 | 24 | 24 | 61 | 61 | 38.5 | 38.5 |
| 5 | 27 | 27 | 62 | 62 | 38 | 38 |
| 6 | 31 | 31 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| 7 | 35 | 35 | 63 | 63 | 37 | 37 |
| 8 | 39 | 39 | 63.5 | 63.5 | 36.5 | 36.5 |
| 9 | 43 | 43 | 64 | 64 | 36 | 36 |
| PW | 47 | 47 | 64 | 64 | 35.75 | 35.75 |
| W | 51 | — | 64 | — | 35.5 | — |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Lofts compared
- AP2 (2008)
- ZM
What the differences mean
Every club the two sets share has exactly the same loft, starting with a 35° 7-iron. On paper there is no distance or trajectory difference: with the same swing, a 7-iron from either set should launch and carry about the same. The real differences are in how the heads are built, how they look at address and how they feel at impact, none of which a spec table can show. Lie angles and lengths match as well, so any fitting adjustment made to one set would carry straight over to the other.
The sets are built differently: the AP2 (2008) runs 3-iron to W (9 clubs), the ZM 3-iron to PW (8 clubs).
The AP2 (2008) is a players iron and the ZM a blade iron, so they sit one step apart on the forgiveness scale. The AP2 (2008) is the more forgiving design, with a wider sole, more offset and more perimeter weighting for roughly scratch to 10 handicaps. The ZM trades some of that for a more compact head, thinner topline and more control over flight and shape, which suits low single-digit handicaps who strike the ball consistently.
The AP2 (2008) is listed as forged, multi-material dual cavity and the ZM as forged muscleback. The AP2 (2008) adds tungsten weighting, which lowers the centre of gravity and raises stability on mis-hits, helping the long irons launch. The ZM's muscle-back shape keeps mass directly behind the strike for feedback and control, where a cavity spreads it to the perimeter for forgiveness.
Both sets were introduced in 2008, so this is a choice between two models from the same lineup rather than an upgrade: Titleist designed them to sit side by side for different players.
Which should you choose?
The AP2 (2008) and ZM share the same lofts on every club on file, so the difference is in head construction, feel and forgiveness rather than trajectory.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Titleist AP2 (2008) specs and Titleist ZM specs.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Titleist AP2 (2008) stronger lofted than the ZM?
No. Both have a 35° 7-iron and the same loft on every club they share, so neither is stronger lofted. The difference is in construction and feel.
What is the loft difference between the Titleist AP2 (2008) and ZM?
There is none. Every club both sets include has the same loft, including the 35° 7-iron.
Which is better for higher handicap golfers, the Titleist AP2 (2008) or the ZM?
The Titleist AP2 (2008). As a players iron it is the more forgiving design, suited to roughly scratch to 10 handicaps. The ZM is a blade iron, better suited to low single-digit handicaps who strike the ball consistently.
Do the Titleist AP2 (2008) and ZM have the same lie and length?
At the 7-iron, yes: both are 63° lie and 37 inches long.
Shop Titleist AP2 (2008)
Compare prices for new and used sets on eBay:
We may earn a commission from purchases made through links on this page at no extra cost to you.