Miura KM-700 vs Miura TC-202
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Specification comparison
| Club | KM-700 loft | TC-202 loft | KM-700 lie | TC-202 lie | KM-700 length | TC-202 length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | — | 21 | — | 60.5 | — | 39 |
| 4 | 23 | 23 | 61 | 61 | 38.5 | 38.5 |
| 5 | 26 | 26 | 61.5 | 61.5 | 38 | 38 |
| 6 | 29 | 29 | 62 | 62 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| 7 | 33 | 33 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 37 | 37 |
| 8 | 37 | 37 | 63 | 63 | 36.5 | 36.5 |
| 9 | 41 | 41 | 63.5 | 63.5 | 36 | 36 |
| PW | 46 | 45 | 64 | 64 | 35.75 | 35.75 |
| GW | — | 50 | — | 64 | — | 35.5 |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Lofts compared
- KM-700
- TC-202
What the differences mean
At the 7-iron, the KM-700 is 33° and the TC-202 is 33°, identical at the club most golfers compare on, although other clubs in the sets differ. Across the 7 clubs both sets share, the differences roughly cancel out, with the largest gap at the PW (46° vs 45°). The pitching wedges are 46° and 45°; the stronger one leaves a 5° jump to a 50° gap wedge, which matters when planning wedge gapping.
The sets are built differently: the KM-700 runs 4-iron to PW (7 clubs), the TC-202 3-iron to GW (9 clubs).
Both are players irons, built for roughly scratch to 10 handicaps. Small-to-mid cavity backs with traditional lofts, modest offset and workable shaping for low-handicap players. Because they target the same golfer, the decision comes down to the specific loft, feel and shaping differences rather than who the sets are made for.
The KM-700 is listed as forged compact cavity with toe-cut sole grind and the TC-202 as forged tour cavity with T-Weight Bar and variable-depth cavity. With the build method this similar, differences in feel come down to head size, sole width, topline and offset rather than how the heads are made.
The TC-202 came out 3 years after the KM-700, but it is a different line rather than a direct replacement, so the two were designed for different golfers as well as different seasons.
Which should you choose?
The TC-202 is the stronger-lofted set — up to 1° stronger than the KM-700 on matching clubs. Expect longer carry per numbered iron but a flatter descent angle; gapping at the wedge end is where that shows up.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Miura KM-700 specs and Miura TC-202 specs.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Miura KM-700 stronger lofted than the TC-202?
Not at the 7-iron, where both are 33°. Other clubs in the sets differ, so compare the full table above.
What is the loft difference between the Miura KM-700 and TC-202?
At the 7-iron the difference is 0° (33° vs 33°). The largest gap on a shared club is 1° at the PW, and 1 of the 7 shared clubs differ.
Are the Miura KM-700 and TC-202 aimed at the same golfer?
Yes. Both are players irons, built for roughly scratch to 10 handicaps. Choose on feel, looks and gapping, ideally after hitting both.
Do the Miura KM-700 and TC-202 have the same lie and length?
At the 7-iron, yes: both are 62.5° lie and 37 inches long.
Shop Miura KM-700
Compare prices for new and used sets on eBay:
We may earn a commission from purchases made through links on this page at no extra cost to you.