Mizuno MX-200 vs Mizuno MX-300

Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.

Specification comparison

ClubMX-200 loftMX-300 loftMX-200 lieMX-300 lieMX-200 lengthMX-300 length
3202059.559.538.7538.75
42323606038.2538.25
5262660.560.537.7537.75
62929616137.2537.25
7333361.561.536.7536.75
83737626236.2536.25
9414162.562.535.7535.75
PW4545636335.535.5
GW5050636335.2535.25
SW55—63—35.25—

Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.

Lofts compared

  • MX-200
  • MX-300
MX-200 and MX-300 lofts comparedLine chart of loft in degrees by club for the MX-200 and the MX-300. 3: 20 and 20. 4: 23 and 23. 5: 26 and 26. 6: 29 and 29. 7: 33 and 33. 8: 37 and 37. 9: 41 and 41. PW: 45 and 45. GW: 50 and 50. SW: 55 and none.20°30°40°50°60°3456789PWGWSWMX-200 3: 20°MX-200 4: 23°MX-200 5: 26°MX-200 6: 29°MX-200 7: 33°MX-200 8: 37°MX-200 9: 41°MX-200 PW: 45°MX-200 GW: 50°MX-200 SW: 55°MX-300 3: 20°MX-300 4: 23°MX-300 5: 26°MX-300 6: 29°MX-300 7: 33°MX-300 8: 37°MX-300 9: 41°MX-300 PW: 45°MX-300 GW: 50°Loft
Lofts match on every club the two sets share, so the markers sit on top of each other.

What the differences mean

Every club the two sets share has exactly the same loft, starting with a 33° 7-iron. On paper there is no distance or trajectory difference: with the same swing, a 7-iron from either set should launch and carry about the same. The real differences are in how the heads are built, how they look at address and how they feel at impact, none of which a spec table can show. Lie angles and lengths match as well, so any fitting adjustment made to one set would carry straight over to the other.

The sets are built differently: the MX-200 runs 3-iron to SW (10 clubs), the MX-300 3-iron to GW (9 clubs).

The MX-200 is a game improvement iron and the MX-300 a players iron, so they sit 2 steps apart on the forgiveness scale. The MX-200 is the more forgiving design, with a wider sole, more offset and more perimeter weighting for roughly 10 to 25 handicaps. The MX-300 trades some of that for a more compact head, thinner topline and more control over flight and shape, which suits roughly scratch to 10 handicaps.

The MX-200 is listed as Grain Flow Forged with a Y-Tune pocket cavity and the MX-300 as Grain Flow Forged with an undercut cavity. With the build method this similar, differences in feel come down to head size, sole width, topline and offset rather than how the heads are made.

The MX-300 came out 1 year after the MX-200, but it is a different line rather than a direct replacement, so the two were designed for different golfers as well as different seasons.

Which should you choose?

The MX-200 and MX-300 share the same lofts on every club on file, so the difference is in head construction, feel and forgiveness rather than trajectory.

Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Mizuno MX-200 specs and Mizuno MX-300 specs.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Mizuno MX-200 stronger lofted than the MX-300?

No. Both have a 33° 7-iron and the same loft on every club they share, so neither is stronger lofted. The difference is in construction and feel.

What is the loft difference between the Mizuno MX-200 and MX-300?

There is none. Every club both sets include has the same loft, including the 33° 7-iron.

Which is better for higher handicap golfers, the Mizuno MX-200 or the MX-300?

The Mizuno MX-200. As a game improvement iron it is the more forgiving design, suited to roughly 10 to 25 handicaps. The MX-300 is a players iron, better suited to roughly scratch to 10 handicaps.

Do the Mizuno MX-200 and MX-300 have the same lie and length?

At the 7-iron, yes: both are 61.5° lie and 36.75 inches long.

Shop Mizuno MX-200

Compare prices for new and used sets on eBay:

We may earn a commission from purchases made through links on this page at no extra cost to you.