Ping G700 vs Ping i500
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Ping G700hollow body with a maraging steel face · maraging C300 steel face plasma-welded to a 17-4 stainless bodyPing i500hollow body · maraging steel face over a forged body
Specification comparison
| Club | G700 loft | i500 loft | G700 lie | i500 lie | G700 length | i500 length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | — | 18 | — | 60 | — | 39.5 |
| 4 | 20 | 21 | 60.5 | 60.5 | 38.875 | 38.875 |
| 5 | 23 | 24 | 61 | 61 | 38.25 | 38.25 |
| 6 | 26 | 27 | 61.5 | 61.5 | 37.625 | 37.625 |
| 7 | 29.5 | 30.5 | 62 | 62 | 37 | 37 |
| 8 | 34 | 35 | 62.8 | 62.8 | 36.5 | 36.5 |
| 9 | 39 | 40 | 63.5 | 63.5 | 36 | 36 |
| PW | 44 | 45 | 64.1 | 64.1 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
| UW | 49 | 50 | 64.1 | 64.1 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
| SW | 54 | — | 64.4 | — | 35.25 | — |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Which should you choose?
The i500 is the weaker-lofted set — up to 1° weaker than the G700. That trades raw distance for a steeper landing angle and more predictable stopping power into greens.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Ping G700 specs and Ping i500 specs.