Wilson Staff C200 vs Wilson Staff C300 Forged
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Wilson Staff C200investment cast, multi-material · stainless steel with TE031 urethane perimeterWilson Staff C300 Forgedforged body with Power Holes through the sole and topline · forged carbon steel with urethane-filled Power Holes
Specification comparison
| Club | Staff C200 loft | Staff C300 Forged loft | Staff C200 lie | Staff C300 Forged lie | Staff C200 length | Staff C300 Forged length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 19 | — | 59.5 | — | 39.5 | — |
| 4 | 22 | 23 | 60 | 60 | 39 | 38.75 |
| 5 | 25 | 26 | 61 | 61 | 38.5 | 38.25 |
| 6 | 28 | 29 | 61.5 | 61.5 | 38 | 37.75 |
| 7 | 32 | 33 | 62 | 62 | 37.5 | 37.25 |
| 8 | 36 | 37 | 63 | 63 | 37 | 36.75 |
| 9 | 40 | 41 | 63.5 | 63.5 | 36.5 | 36.25 |
| PW | 44 | 45 | 64 | 64 | 35.75 | 35.75 |
| GW | 48 | 49 | 64.5 | 64 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Which should you choose?
The Staff C300 Forged is the weaker-lofted set — up to 1° weaker than the Staff C200. That trades raw distance for a steeper landing angle and more predictable stopping power into greens.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Wilson Staff C200 specs and Wilson Staff C300 Forged specs.