Maltby TS-2 vs Maltby TS-3
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Maltby TS-2three-piece billet forged hollow body, polymer filled, tungsten toe weight · forged 1025C carbon steel body and 2 mm face, internal tungsten weightMaltby TS-3five-step precision forged, co-forged tungsten toe weight, progressive cavity · forged 1025C carbon steel with co-forged tungsten weight
Specification comparison
| Club | TS-2 loft | TS-3 loft | TS-2 lie | TS-3 lie | TS-2 length | TS-3 length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 21 | 22 | 61 | 61 | 38.5 | 38.5 |
| 5 | 24 | 25 | 61.5 | 61.5 | 38 | 38 |
| 6 | 27 | 28 | 62 | 62 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| 7 | 30 | 32 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 37 | 37 |
| 8 | 34 | 36 | 63 | 63 | 36.5 | 36.5 |
| 9 | 39 | 40 | 63.5 | 63.5 | 36 | 36 |
| PW | 44 | 44 | 64 | 64 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
| GW | 49 | 48 | 64 | 64 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Which should you choose?
The TS-3 is the weaker-lofted set — up to 2° weaker than the TS-2. That trades raw distance for a steeper landing angle and more predictable stopping power into greens.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Maltby TS-2 specs and Maltby TS-3 specs.