Ping G Le2 vs Ping G Le3
Side-by-side factory specifications. Differing values are highlighted.
Ping G Le2investment cast with COR-Eye face technology and a tungsten toe weight · 17-4 stainless steelPing G Le3investment cast · 17-4 stainless steel with high-density heel and toe weights
Specification comparison
| Club | G Le2 loft | G Le3 loft | G Le2 lie | G Le3 lie | G Le2 length | G Le3 length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 27 | 25 | 61.1 | 61.5 | 37.13 | 37.125 |
| 7 | 30.5 | 29.5 | 62 | 62 | 36.5 | 36.5 |
| 8 | 35 | 35 | 62.8 | 62.8 | 36 | 36 |
| 9 | 40 | 41 | 63.5 | 63.5 | 35.5 | 35.5 |
| PW | 45 | 46 | 64.1 | 64.1 | 35 | 35 |
| UW | 52 | 52 | 64.1 | 64.1 | 35 | 35 |
| SW | 58 | 56 | 64.6 | 64.4 | 34.5 | 34.5 |
Highlighted cells differ between the two sets. Lofts and lies are factory standard.
Which should you choose?
The G Le3 is the stronger-lofted set — up to 2° stronger than the G Le2 on matching clubs. Expect longer carry per numbered iron but a flatter descent angle; gapping at the wedge end is where that shows up.
Both charts are reproduced in full on their own pages: Ping G Le2 specs and Ping G Le3 specs.